| Home \ Media \ Media Coverage |
|
Media Coverage
Search for:
in:
Cordis News
Report calls for legislation on Lisbon Agenda
Date: 13 April 2007
A report by the Stockholm Network, a European think tank, has recommended that specific EU legislation be put in place to monitor progress on the Lisbon Agenda and provide more measurable goals and timelines. It also calls for the European Research Area (ERA) to be placed further up on the political agenda, and for the harmonisation of the European patent system. (This article first appeared in Cordis News on 13th April 2007).
eGov Monitor
Lisbon failing EU businesses
Date: 12 April 2007
Reform of the strategic aims behind the Lisbon agenda is required to ensure European businesses do not continue to lag behind the US and the Far East. A new report by the leading think tank, The Stockholm Network, recommends that a 2007 Lisbon Directive is established to monitor progress and provide more measurable goals and timelines. (This article first appeared in eGov Monitor in April 2007).
18 Doughty Street
Helen Disney's interview at 18 Doughty Street
Date: 22 March 2007
http://doughty.gdbtv.com/player.php
IFPI
The Economics of DRM in Capitalist Markets
Date: 20 March 2007
At the outset it is worth noting that DRM is a concept that broadly refers to different sets of technologies aimed at identifying and protecting digital content belonging to IP rights-holders. At times, DRM is treated as synonymous with technological protection measures (TPMs), which are aimed primarily at preventing the unauthorised copying and downloading of digital content or (though less frequently) to rights management information (RMI), aimed at identifying digital works and managing the provision of material to customers, or both.3 It should also be pointed out that depending on the characteristics of the content provided and the different media on which it is provided, different industries (for example the music, film and game industries) use different DRM systems to serve different purposes.
Public Finance
Food policy proves hard to digest
Date: 16 February 2007
This uncertainty around food safety helps neither the reputation of British businesses competing in a global economy, nor the government which ultimately takes the blame when things go wrong.
With this in mind, perhaps it is time we gave the Food Standards Agency greater powers to be independent from government and to become a genuine watchdog with enough teeth to bite on the safety loopholes that still seem to exist in the creation and distribution of our food products. |